US Supreme Court temporarily halts deportations of migrants

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

The US Supreme Court has temporarily barred Donald Trump from using a rarely-used law dating back to the 18th century to deport a group of Venezuelan migrants

The country’s highest court said in the early hours of Saturday that the government was “directed not to remove any member of the putative class of detainees from the United States until a further order of this court”.

The Trump administration has been attempting to remove alleged members of a Venezuelan gang using the Alien Enemies Act of 1798,  a law last invoked during the second world war to intern non-US citizens of Italian, German and Japanese descent.

Two of the court’s nine judges, conservatives Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, dissented from the majority ruling.

Lawyers for the migrants, who are being held in a Texas prison, expressed relief at the decision.

“These men were in imminent danger of spending their lives in a horrific foreign prison without ever having had a chance to go to court,” said Lee Gelernt, a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union, who is a lead counsel in the case.

Several alleged members of the Tren de Aragua gang were deported to a jail in El Salvador last month, despite a court order blocking their deportations.

Lower court judge James Boasberg had issued a temporary restraining order blocking the administration’s attempts to deport the alleged gang members. The order prompted President Donald Trump to call for his impeachment.

The alleged gang members were flown to El Salvador despite Boasberg’s ruling that the planes they were on should be turned around.

“We are relieved that the Supreme Court has not permitted the administration to whisk them away, the way others were just last month,” Gelernt said.

Earlier this month, the Supreme Court lifted the freeze on deportations in a 5-4 vote that was seen as a win for the White House.

However, that judgment did not rule on Trump’s attempt to use the long-standing legislation. Instead it was a narrow order saying that the Venezuelan men who sought to challenge Trump had filed their lawsuit in the wrong jurisdiction.

Related Posts

Labour to link settled status for migrants to good citizenship

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter. Migrants will be forced to prove they are net contributors…

Read more

UK government approves second runway at Gatwick airport

Plans to build a £2.2bn second runway at London’s Gatwick airport were given the green light by the government on Sunday evening, with ministers hoping that planes could be using…

Read more

France, Germany and UK prepare to reimpose sanctions on Iran

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free Your guide to what Trump’s second term means for Washington, business and the world The UK, France and Germany are preparing on…

Read more

UK gender pay gap understated for past two decades, report finds

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter. The UK statistics agency has underestimated the country’s gender pay…

Read more

A return to tariffs, Taco or not

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free Your guide to what Trump’s second term means for Washington, business and the world Like a dog to a bone, Donald Trump…

Read more

Starmer moves to bolster Reeves after tearful Commons episode fuels bonds slump

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter. Sir Keir Starmer has said Rachel Reeves will be chancellor…

Read more

Leave a Reply